<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName></PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>عنوان مجله</JournalTitle>
      <Issn></Issn>
      <Volume>2</Volume>
      <Issue>Serial Number 5</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2025</Year>
        <Month>05</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Complexity Leadership Theory Revisited: A Systematic Review of Applications in Modern Management Systems</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>Complexity Leadership Theory Revisited: A Systematic Review of Applications in Modern Management Systems</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage>22</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>31</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <Abstract>&lt;p&gt;This study aimed to revisit Complexity Leadership Theory by exploring how its core principles are understood, applied, and extended in modern management systems characterized by uncertainty, digital transformation, interdependence, and adaptive organizational change. This study adopted a qualitative, review-informed research design based on semi-structured interviews with 22 senior managers, organizational-development consultants, academic experts, and digital transformation leaders working in Tehran. Participants were selected through purposive and snowball sampling because they had direct experience with leadership, organizational change, innovation management, or complex system transformation. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews lasting 45–75 minutes. Theoretical saturation was reached after the eighteenth interview, and four additional interviews were conducted to confirm the stability of the emerging categories. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis supported by NVivo software. Coding proceeded through open coding, axial categorization, theme refinement, and interpretive synthesis. The findings identified four main categories explaining the application of Complexity Leadership Theory in modern management systems: adaptive leadership as distributed problem-solving, enabling leadership as the creation of adaptive space, administrative leadership as alignment without excessive control, and network-based learning as the foundation of organizational renewal. Participants emphasized that leadership in contemporary organizations is no longer limited to individual authority or formal hierarchy; rather, it emerges through interaction, experimentation, informal networks, and the ability to connect operational stability with innovation. Interviewees described complexity leadership as especially relevant in digital transformation, agile management, knowledge-intensive work, and turbulent market conditions. The study concludes that Complexity Leadership Theory provides a powerful framework for understanding leadership in modern management systems, but its practical application requires a balance between order and emergence. Effective leaders in complex organizations do not merely command, control, or motivate individuals; they design conditions in which adaptive responses can emerge, circulate, and become institutionalized. The findings suggest that future organizations need leadership systems that combine structural coordination, psychological safety, cross-boundary collaboration, digital learning capability, and adaptive experimentation.&lt;/p&gt;</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Complexity Leadership Theory</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">modern management systems</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">adaptive leadership</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">enabling leadership</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">complex adaptive systems</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">organizational change</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">qualitative research</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Tehran</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.msels.com/index.php/msels/article/download/31/29</ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
