<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName></PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>عنوان مجله</JournalTitle>
      <Issn></Issn>
      <Volume>3</Volume>
      <Issue>Serial Number 10</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>03</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Building Future-Ready Management Systems: A Qualitative Framework for Leadership Transformation</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>Building Future-Ready Management Systems: A Qualitative Framework for Leadership Transformation</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage>50</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>59</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <Abstract>&lt;p&gt;This study aimed to develop a qualitative framework explaining how leadership transformation contributes to the design and institutionalization of future-ready management systems in digitally turbulent and strategically uncertain organizational environments. The study adopted a qualitative interpretive design based on semi-structured interviews with 24 participants selected through purposive and theoretical sampling from organizations located in Tehran. Participants included senior executives, middle managers, human resource and organizational development specialists, digital transformation managers, and management consultants with direct experience in strategic change, digitalization, or leadership development. Data collection continued until theoretical saturation was reached after 21 interviews, followed by three confirmatory interviews to refine the emerging categories. Interviews lasted between 55 and 90 minutes, were transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis supported by NVivo software. Open coding, axial categorization, constant comparison, memo writing, and peer review were used to enhance analytic rigor and trustworthiness. The analysis generated five main categories: strategic sensing and environmental intelligence, distributed adaptive decision-making, digital-human capability orchestration, cultural resilience and learning governance, and ethical accountability infrastructure. The findings showed that future-ready management systems are not merely technology-enabled administrative structures but dynamic sociotechnical systems in which leadership shifts from command, control, and individual authority toward sensemaking, empowerment, boundary-spanning coordination, experimentation, and responsible governance. Participants emphasized that future readiness depends on leaders’ ability to translate uncertainty into strategic learning, redesign decision rights, integrate human judgment with digital tools, and create trust-based cultures capable of rapid adaptation. The study proposes a qualitative framework in which leadership transformation operates as the central mechanism through which organizations convert environmental turbulence into adaptive managerial capability. Future-ready management systems require leaders who can combine strategic foresight, digital fluency, participatory governance, learning-centered culture, and ethical accountability. The framework contributes to leadership and management systems literature by integrating dynamic capabilities, digital transformation, and complexity perspectives into an empirically grounded model.&lt;/p&gt;</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">future-ready management systems</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">leadership transformation</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">digital transformation</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">qualitative research</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">adaptive leadership</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">dynamic capabilities</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">organizational learning</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.msels.com/index.php/msels/article/download/72/64</ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
